The Porn Myth: Are Real Women Just Bad Porn?
A friend sent over an article by Naomi Wolf published quite a few years back that attempts to debunk the porn myth and its effects on the intimate lives of men and women. Wolf’s argument to ‘turn off the porn’, she claims, is not a moral one but a scientific one relating to physical and emotional health: “greater supply of the stimulant equals diminished capacity”. But has the sexual objectification of women by porn actually led men into being turned off the ‘real’ thing or is Wolf failing to see the bigger picture?
Dropping any religious arguments and minus the illegal stuff, porn in itself isn’t necessarily a negative thing. Acting as a stimulant, it becomes an exploration of one’s sexuality and an expression of sexual desire. There is no ‘one’ type of porn and anyone who has flicked through will see a variety of ‘genres’. People have different sexual desires and like any consumable good the porn industry caters to its different markets. Some may enjoy the ‘surgically hoisted breasts and Brazilian bikini wax’ pornstars; others prefer the amateur type because it offers a more realistic depiction. The ‘real’ women that Wolf physically speaks off, with real breasts and pores, can and do exist alongside other women who, despite being surgically enhanced or fetishised, are equally ‘real’ (they are alive aren’t they?). So what is the problem?
Men, sex and power
Porn as we know it is male-stream, it creates narratives about sex and sexuality that are present in everyday life, one in which they become defined by patriarchal social constructs. When I spoke to a few of my straight male friends about their opinions on what expectations porn creates, all of them agreed that it objectifies women and plays into ideas of what a woman should be doing in the bedroom. Some went as far as saying that many then equate rough sex as being synonymous with good sex.
But these images aren’t just in porn; they are all around us. Everywhere we look we see pornographic women ready and willing to please powerful men sexually. These hoisted tits, pore-less, tanned creatures are jiggling their goodies in music videos, on American Apparel clothing adverts posing in positions that
scream karma sutra and singing songs begging ‘rude boys’ to ‘get it up’. ‘Real’ women, women in their diversity or complexity aren’t explored here; images of sexual perfection are sold to us alongside tips on how to please our partners. These women that are consumed by women and men feed into ideas about sex, power and gender; porn merely reifies them.
Sex has become a form of power that enables men to assert their authority through controlling women’s bodies, and in this case, women’s pleasure. It not only constructs sexual expectations (‘lady in the streets but a freak in the bed’) but also forms idea about what a man needs to do to attain such power and how to assert it. I remember an ex of mine became so used to watching men in porn who could excuse my French fuck for days with a 10inch dick, he ended up developing insecurities over his own sexual performance. He believed that all women must want what those women were getting, that he couldn’t measure up and that somehow made him less of a man. Looking back on it now, I can’t help but think that his increasingly sexually debased ideas were subconsciously linked to him attempting to reassert his masculinity.
For most, this power play is enacted through submission/domination (which can be quite subtle) and whilst in porn, like in music, these scenarios surrender women willing, reality can offer a violent alternative (just check out Rihanna’s necessary exploration in her new video ‘man down’). It is then no surprise that in a hypersexualized society that guarantees power through male sexual authority, 1 in 3 women have been beaten or coerced into sex in their lifetime; or that 54% of rapes in the UK are committed by a woman’s current or ex-partner. Love seems almost entirely a separate discussion and sex is reduced to an act, one devoid of intimacy.
Lets talk about sex
Wolf’s solution to her supposed findings of the lowered male libido for real sex (seemingly equated with the missionary position) is elementary to say the least. She suggests that we prohibit the sex that is currently ‘on tap’ and return to biblical conceptions of sexual sacredness to keep men interested. Her solution, however, still implicates women as objects of desire serving male sexual prowess.
Whether they are covered up or walking down the street naked, women aren’t simply to be had like cattle in a meat market. The truth is that women too are sexual beings just like men. It makes no difference if they are in porn or a nightclub; they still have a right to their own sexual agency and authority. A 2006 survey found that the number of women who downloaded porn had soared to 1.4 million. The rise in female porn directors to shift from the female objectification that dominates the industry is proof of women wanting to explore their sexuality. For some women this is in private, for others it may be with their partner; either way women need to be able to express their desires in
a space not subject to the current framing of patriarchal sexuality.
Sexual gratification and keeping one another ‘interested’, however, really comes
from having an understanding of sex and physical intimacy that is mutual and reciprocated. One of my male friends laughed a little, claiming how partners should discuss sex openly before having it, how they need to engage in learning and sharing one another. Lord knows my man has to be willing to take the time and effort to try new things and keep it spicy on days where missionary and a quickie just won’t do.
‘Real’ women aren’t just bad porn in a patriarchal society women as objects of men’s sexual desires are, creating little space for healthy sex as an act between real, living people. If we really want to solve this problem, we need to critically engage with how society conceptualizes sex in general and the implications it has on gendered identities, power, love and relationships – not just as an act. People, be it with one partner or more, in or outside of marriage, will engage in sex at some point in their lives. Addressing it in a more holistic way, as part of a broader framework between and across genders is pertinent if we are to create and sustain healthy sexual relationships or passionate bonds in general. Dare I say it: lets talk about sex!
Here are some recommended reading/videos:
(watch all 9 parts!)
A highly in-depth and accurate summary of modern sexual attraction.. 9/10
Well done Hana
Very interesting read. Agree with everything. One thing did give me pause. Are women becoming porn directors to explore female sexuality? Or to cash in?
Do you see a difference between porn and erotica?
To me, and this may just be my own jaundiced eyes, our whole society is somewhat pornographic, not just the sexual arena. Take Shampoo Porn for instance. We see these great images where the product is photographed in the best packaging and lighting. We see the “glorious hair” of the woman in the ad who has used the product. We are seduced by a soothing voice praising wonderful looking hair. Yet when we try the product, our hair just doesn’t seem fulfilled. The Capitalist Pimps of Consumerism pornographize (yay, a new word!) every desire they can invent or identify.
Got to your site when researching Ana Mendieta, and on Coco’s (the author of the article I read) website, she mentions you. Great site.
thanks for the read Barg – glad you enjoyed it. i completely agree with you with regards to society being pornographic – sex sells in a white supremacist capitalist patriarchy and what we see in porn is what we see (to varying degrees and in different forms) in daily life in the images all around us. no doubt there are probably some who are cashing in but i’ve come across a few interviews over the years by female porn directors starting their own companies precisely because they were frustrated with what they were seeing and in acknowledging their own sexuality/desire wanted to see something different. i don’t know if it will/does anything to undermine sexist and misogynist depictions that plague porn or really accompany porn but on surface level i used it as an example that we need to get with it that women have sexual agency too. i’ve never actually considered the difference between porn and erotica so thank you for making me think about that one. there most likely is, although i’ve never explored erotica per se so you’ve given me something to think about. what do you feel is the difference and why?
Guess the difference has a lot to do with the viewer. For some, erotica is porn. For me, porn sensationalizes, leaves nothing to the imagination. Narrowly focused. Concrete.
Erotica is more sensual, poetic if you will, stimulates the senses and the imagination. More expansive. Fluid.
In a way, I think pornography plays to a kind of constrained, rabid hunger, and erotica plays more to full-bodied desire. Don’t know if that makes sense to anyone but me.
Another problem around the issue of pornography is that we live in a culture that is both Puritanical and pornographic. A kind of bi-polar morality. I think that makes a lot of people crazy. Sex is both forbidden and expected. And in a patriarchal culture, that puts women in an impossible position.
Certainly agree that it’s important to get women’s sexual agency out of the closet. But can’t see how women directing traditional porn really does that. That seems more like a copy-cat killing to me. Of course, I’m not suggesting that female sexual agency is one particular thing, or that there aren’t women whose sexual proclivities don’t lean towards traditional porn.
What’s also interesting to me, is that porn (and erotica) is so focused on the visual. When, at least for me, sex is one of the few times when my visual sense isn’t doing the most work. Smelling, touching, tasting, hearing, sounding is much more alive during sex than when going about my normal day (though one meditates to increase one’s daily sensual involvement). The ultimate erotica would not be shown on a screen, but experienced in a full-sensory theater or something. If you see what I mean.
I also think about things like this that may have some influence. What if we grew up hearing about “complementary sexes” instead of “opposite sexes”? After all, anatomically, male and female anatomy fit together sexually in a complementary way. What if we grew up hearing about “the fiesta of the sexes” instead of “the battle of the sexes”? How do the ideas imparted to us in our linguistic upbringing affect gender relations?
Haven’t thought about this stuff in a while, so thank you for the opportunity to think and talk about it. Would love to hear what you think about porn/erotica when you’ve had a chance to mull it over.